The Ten Faces of Innovation
Introduction
Picture the scene—a new idea is being discussed, and somebody says, “Let me play the devil’s advocate.” This person then goes on to tear apart the idea, leading to its untimely demise.
Tom Kelley and Jonathan Littman, authors of The Ten Faces of Innovation believe that this is anathema to the process of design and idea creation. Instead of the “devil’s advocate,” they propose ten roles individuals can play that will lead to increased creativity and more successful innovation. In this paper I will review these roles and discuss applications that I see from them in the design process.
The Anthropologist
The authors quote Marcel Proust as saying, “The real act of discover consists not in finding new lands, but in seeing with new eyes” (16).
This quote captures the basic role of anthropologists, which is to carefully observe, and learn lessons from what they see. The authors posit that there is much to learn if we will simply open our eyes to observe. One of the keys of being an anthropologist is to, as much as possible, have the experiences of those that you want to study. For example, one IDEO “anthropologist” spent 48 hours in the hospital with a patient to better understand the kinds of treatment she would receive.
I related this to how I, as an author, could spend time in bookstores interviewing people who chose to buy (or not buy) particular books. I could learn a great deal from watching what customers pick up, how they interact with, and talking to them about why they purchase the products they purchase. This information could help in the designing of future books.
Another key insight from this chapter is that anthropology holds a key for understanding the future. The authors quote Henry Ford who said, “If I had asked my customers what they wanted, they’d have said a faster horse” (37).
Therefore, customer surveys will not necessary tell you what products to design, because the customers themselves have not thought of them yet. But by talking with people and coming to better understand what they really want, one may be able to uncover innovative ideas.
The Experimenter
The experimenter tries to create physical representations or prototypes of ideas, even if they are rudimentary, knowing that just getting started on something often leads to more successful iterations. This is one manifestation of the IDEO axiom to “fail often, to succeed sooner” (52).
As an example of a simple experiment, a store called The Good Guys inserted an advertisement into a magazine that when unfolded was the actual size a 42-inch flat-panel TV would be. One of the reasons people had not yet bought these TVs was that it was hard to picture how it would look in their family room. But this cutout helped them to visualize how the TV would look in their home, and sales dramatically increased as a result. It wasn’t a fancy experiment or design, but it brought great success.
A key to being a good experimenter is to come up with multiple prototypes. If you show somebody a solution to a problem they are having, and you only give them one solution, their response to it “is muddied by what they think about you” (55). But if you are able to give two or three solutions (prototypes) to the problem it will be much easier to further experiment and play with the possibilities.
The Cross-Pollinator
The third type of person discussed is the “cross-pollinator.” Many common inventions we have today came from cross-pollination—the escalator and the Frisbee being two examples. Cross-pollinators are people who can take knowledge from one area and transfer it into another. Oftentimes they have deep knowledge in one area, and broad knowledge in others. They combine their deep knowledge with new things they learn to create innovative ideas.
To increase one’s ability to cross-pollinate, one should learn about a variety of topics and travel to different places. Look for connections between what you are learning and what you are an expert in. For example, as I am learning about design, I can take what I learn and apply it in an area where I have deeper knowledge (religious education) and find new ways of doing things (cross-pollination).
The Hurdler
The hurdler does things even if, and sometimes especially when, they are hard. Regardless of budget constraints or other difficulties, hurdlers find ways to accomplish their goals. One example of a hurdler is Richard Drew, who as a young employee of 3M invented scotch tape, even when his superiors told him to focus on other things, and refused to budget for his research. He leaped through the hurdles and succeeded anyways.
In some respects the hurdler is the opposite of the devil’s advocate. While the devil’s advocate will say all the reasons why something can’t be done, the hurdler will focus on ways things can be accomplished. When somebody plays the role of the hurdler solutions will be uncovered where none were previously seen.
The Collaborator
The collaborator is a bridge-builder one who can help get people with different points of view to work together. They “stir up the pot. They bring people together to get things done” (114).
One of the innovative ideas a collaborator can use is an “unfocus group.” This means pulling together a group of people who are different, and are all extremely passionate about what they believe in. They can often bring new ideas to the table and a collaborator can help capture these. “Quirky, fun, and often surprising, unfocus groups give companies a chance to see real people interact and experiment with products and things they care about” (122).
A great metaphor for collaboration is the relay race. In an Olympic relay, each of the four runners in the 400 meter could run the 100 meter in about 10 seconds. But they could run the relay in 37.4 seconds. How did they do this? It was possible because by the time the handoff occurred, the second runner was already running at top speed.
Recently I have been involved in a collaborative effort in designing a book. This book was conceived to be something totally different for anything on the market for LDS youth. The three main collaborators have been two co-authors, and the publishing director. Chris, the publishing director on this project has been the quintessential collaborator. He has mediated difficulties, inspired new ideas, and reached out to others with a variety of specialties to make the project better. This experience has shown me that multiple heads are better than one, and the person who can successfully stimulate collaboration is a very valuable team-member .
The Director
The role of director is likened to that of a director in a movie. He brings together a good cast of individuals and then lets them have the limelight. Directors do not have all of the ideas themselves, but can pull great things from others. For example, directors often engage in brainstorming. The authors state that one of the keys to have successful brainstorming is to “Begin with a clear statement of the problem of the problem, a question that’s open-ended but not too broad.” (151).
IDEO has rules such as “go for quantity, encourage wild ideas, be visual, defer judgment, [and] one conversation at a time” (151). These rules help keep things flowing and prevent good ideas from being killed too soon.
They also suggest numbering the ideas and to “capture…ideas in visual, low-tech mediums that everyone can share. Spatial memory is a powerful force you can use to guide the participants back on track” (152).
The Experience Architect
The next type of individual discussed is the experience architect. These individuals are “people who focus relentlessly on creating remarkable customer experiences” (166).
There were several examples of how companies had been able to make breakthrough designs by considering the experience that the customers were having. For example, when one needs to put antifreeze into a car there is often a complicated mixing that needs to take place in order for the antifreeze-water ratio to be just right. An innovative company changed this “experience” by creating a product that had a pre-blended mix; making things much easier for the consumer, and changing the experience they had.
As another example, Coldstone has created a whole new “ice cream experience” in which customers get to participate in the creation of their own personalized ice cream treat. Coldstone realized that they were serving more than just ice cream—it was the whole experience of going out to eat a treat that they focused on.
One key suggestion they gave to enhance experience is to bring it to the customer where possible. For example, one dentist would go to a large corporation and do checkups on-site, dramatically reducing the amount of time that employees had to take off for their dental checkups. Having the dentist on-site totally changed the experience.
Currently I am working on the design of some websites that I hope will encourage people to learn more deeply from the scriptures. To take on the role of the experimenter, I need to think about the “experience” that people who use the site will have. There is more to design than the “what to teach” and “how to teach;” the overall experience must also be planned for and created.
The Set Designer
The set designer knows that the space you work in can have a large impact on what gets accomplished. This can be as simple as making sure critical supplies are stocked close at hand, or by changing the surroundings of a room. As an extreme example of the power of set design, when the Cleveland Indians changed their arena they began winning more games. Was this a coincidence? The authors did not think so.
It is important to note that one set is not right for everyone. Some may crave privacy, while others want to be close to others. Realizing that different activities and people may need different types of spaces to work with is all part of the role of the set designer.
I recently changed office locations, and thought carefully about what I would bring to the new office. I am teaching the Book of Mormon and noticed that I had no pictures of the Savior up in my office. I found that putting up a picture of the Savior teaching, along with a picture of my wife, and pictures of former students creates an environment where I can better prepare to teach.
The Nurturer
The authors state, “Think of your best personal experience with a good physician, how they took care of you in a professional way and at the same time nurtured you…that’s exactly the sort of caregiver we all hope for…” (216).
There are several ways that companies can give this kind of care—and the benefits of doing so are obvious. One personal experience I have had with this was an experience related to me by a customer service manager at a Toyota dealership.
He received a call from an angry customer who had been told by a technician that his brake pads needed to be changed. The customer had gone to get a second opinion and had been told that his pads did not need to be changed. The customer accused the Toyota dealership of trying to cheat him.
The customer service manager said, “I want to make sure that you have not been cheated. I will come to your home and personally check the pads for you again.”
The manager did so, and discovered that in fact the pads did not need to be changed. He apologized profusely and offered the man some free services from the dealership. Although this required time, this kind of nurturing won him a client for life.
A specific idea the authors give to increase nurturing is to keep customers informed about wait times. One of the things that customers dislike is uncertainty. Netflix provides a good example by emailing customers notifications of when movies have been received or shipped. This decreases the uncertainty, and increases satisfaction—part of the nurturing process.
When it comes to designing products they should have a nurturing feeling to them. An example of this that I recently saw was an online course in new media (not David Wiley’s). The course had a fun and energetic feel to it, and I felt welcomed there.
The Storyteller
The final role discussed in this book is that of the storyteller. Stories “trigger emotional responses that frequently spark valuable insights” (255).
At IDEO they will often begin design sessions by listening to stories from clients. For example, listening to a story from the benefit of a medical device could be of benefit to them as they begin seeking ways to improve that device.
Not only should companies and individuals tell stories to captivate viewers, they should also listen to the stories of their customers. For example, “Instead of asking questions like ‘what do you like or dislike about your mobile service?’ [say,] ‘Tell me a story about the time your mobile let you down.’” (247).
Engaging in this type of conversation allows more doors to be opened and experiences to be sharer. I believe that story-telling can help me in my efforts to help people gain more from their scripture study. Rather than asking people, “Do you read your scriptures?” I could ask, “Tell me a story about a time when your scripture study helped you.” This latter statement would help me gain much more valuable information.
Conclusion
To me there are two key implications from The Ten Faces of Innovation. First, when I am involved in a design project, I should try to use the lenses of these different roles to help in the design process. In group discussions, rather than looking for reasons why it won’t work (devil’s advocate) I can try to make a prototype of what is being discussed, or facilitated brainstorming as a director would. As I develop proficiency in these additional roles, my usefulness as a part of a design team will increase.
A second implication is that I should consider these different roles in the actual design of products. I could ask questions like, how could we make this a better experience? How can we capture the stories our customers or end-users will have? What can we do to make this a more comfortable (nurturing) design?
Thursday, November 13, 2008
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
Sharing, Part 3
I had a bit of fun with the tools this week!
One good slideshare presentation I found sums up several of the web 2.0 tools we've been talking about in class:
I also uploaded my own PowerPoint and embedded it into a wordpress site I've been working on at http://ldswhy.com/
I may not have mastered Diigo yet... I left a comment on http://boyceducation.blogspot.com/ and I can see it...but can anybody else?
Still working on Google Analytics...right now I haven't been able to integrate it properly into wordpress...but I will get there...or maybe I should use the WP Plugin (?)

Friday, October 17, 2008
Sharing (part 2)
Some of the sharing things this week get me really excited. First, http://youtube.com. What an incredible invention! A couple of years ago I discovered http://youtube.comand was excited about the opportunities that it presented for sharing the gospel with others. At the time I had recently produced a DVD and I decided to upload some of it. It has been seen a few times, and I feel good about that. I also taken some spiritual videos I have (like one of President Hinckley expressing his love to college students) and posted them as well.
In addition, I’ve added some videos that I thought were funny (Grinchmas) and some that are good family videos. All of these videos can be found at: http://www.youtube.com/user/johnhiltoniii To celebrate the “sharing” of this week, I uploaded a new video this week. Be one of the first to see it! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwzguixUDYc
I also found a great way to do podcasting. Go to http://gabcast.com and check it out. You can record a phone conversation and turn it into a podcast or save it as an .mp3 file. And it’s 100% free. I will soon be adding some podcasting features to a new website I am working on: http://ldswhy.com
There are clearly lots of great gospel-sharing sites on http://youtube.com, and I have used some in the past. Sadly the fact that I am doing research for this blog at BYU limits my ability to provide you links at this time. But I did check out http://revver.com (why is http://youtube.com blocked and revver is not?) I found a great video clip that is doubtless available on youtube, but you can find it here:
http://revver.com/video/1153811/mormon-christian-faith-mormons-are-christians/
Well worth watching. Great LDS video.
As to the educational values of these kinds of sharing there are many. In fact the challenge is finding ways to sort through all of the information that is there. For example, http://lecturefox.com/mix/ has hundreds of high-quality university courses that can be downloaded as audio or video files. If I had hours of free time I would listen to them…but right now I am so engrossed in my other studies that I “don’t have time.” But as I look backwards I saw that in my “pre-doctoral” life I did have some time, especially when I was traveling that I could have used to listen to these lectures, and so I hope that I will have this kind of time in the future.
In addition, I’ve added some videos that I thought were funny (Grinchmas) and some that are good family videos. All of these videos can be found at: http://www.youtube.com/user/johnhiltoniii To celebrate the “sharing” of this week, I uploaded a new video this week. Be one of the first to see it! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwzguixUDYc
I also found a great way to do podcasting. Go to http://gabcast.com and check it out. You can record a phone conversation and turn it into a podcast or save it as an .mp3 file. And it’s 100% free. I will soon be adding some podcasting features to a new website I am working on: http://ldswhy.com
There are clearly lots of great gospel-sharing sites on http://youtube.com, and I have used some in the past. Sadly the fact that I am doing research for this blog at BYU limits my ability to provide you links at this time. But I did check out http://revver.com (why is http://youtube.com blocked and revver is not?) I found a great video clip that is doubtless available on youtube, but you can find it here:
http://revver.com/video/1153811/mormon-christian-faith-mormons-are-christians/
Well worth watching. Great LDS video.
As to the educational values of these kinds of sharing there are many. In fact the challenge is finding ways to sort through all of the information that is there. For example, http://lecturefox.com/mix/ has hundreds of high-quality university courses that can be downloaded as audio or video files. If I had hours of free time I would listen to them…but right now I am so engrossed in my other studies that I “don’t have time.” But as I look backwards I saw that in my “pre-doctoral” life I did have some time, especially when I was traveling that I could have used to listen to these lectures, and so I hope that I will have this kind of time in the future.
Saturday, October 11, 2008
Delicious and Flickr
This week was "sharing, part 1" studying the bookmarking and photosharing tools.
I created accounts with delicious and flickr--should you care to check them out you could visit:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/31162943@N04/
Flickr was a fun site. In the past I have never been able to use it because my old CES computer had it blocked. I liked looking at the top new pictures and saw many visuals that I thought, "I could use this in a talk." I liked it.
My delicious account is: http://delicious.com/johnhiltoniii yet sadly no bookmarks have been placed in here. I only use one computer and so I couldn't really find a good use for it. I did look up some of the "top bookmarks" and I thought they were good at pointing me towards good information. One site I liked was: http://lecturefox.com/mix/
Seeing as 1 Billion new pages are added to the Internet everyday, bookmarking tools can be very helpful for sifting through all the information; the key for me is finding people I like and trust point me to good places to go.
Interestingly enough (but perhaps not surprising) there are lots of groups looking at how to use these resources for educational.
Flickr sites:
http://www.jakesonline.org/flickrinclassroom.pdf
http://www.flickr.com/groups/33384223@N00/
Bookmarking for education:
http://www.edtags.org/ This site is not a "delicious" site, but it is pretty cool. It is a way to rank different education sites. I was impressed as it was a good way for me to sort through many different sites through finding out what others have found effective.
PS--I should say it is cool in "concept." Upon further looking into it, it appears that this isn't as developed as it could be. What I thought was #1 vote, was actually that only 1 person had voted on it...
I created accounts with delicious and flickr--should you care to check them out you could visit:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/31162943@N04/
Flickr was a fun site. In the past I have never been able to use it because my old CES computer had it blocked. I liked looking at the top new pictures and saw many visuals that I thought, "I could use this in a talk." I liked it.
My delicious account is: http://delicious.com/johnhiltoniii yet sadly no bookmarks have been placed in here. I only use one computer and so I couldn't really find a good use for it. I did look up some of the "top bookmarks" and I thought they were good at pointing me towards good information. One site I liked was: http://lecturefox.com/mix/
Seeing as 1 Billion new pages are added to the Internet everyday, bookmarking tools can be very helpful for sifting through all the information; the key for me is finding people I like and trust point me to good places to go.
Interestingly enough (but perhaps not surprising) there are lots of groups looking at how to use these resources for educational.
Flickr sites:
http://www.jakesonline.org/flickrinclassroom.pdf
http://www.flickr.com/groups/33384223@N00/
Bookmarking for education:
http://www.edtags.org/ This site is not a "delicious" site, but it is pretty cool. It is a way to rank different education sites. I was impressed as it was a good way for me to sort through many different sites through finding out what others have found effective.
PS--I should say it is cool in "concept." Upon further looking into it, it appears that this isn't as developed as it could be. What I thought was #1 vote, was actually that only 1 person had voted on it...
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
Second Post About Facebook in 1 Day (see--I am addicted).
Have you ever started reading websites and following links, finding so much cool stuff that your brain was going to explode? Then you started closing tabs, only to remember what you had started searching for!
That happened to me today. While searching for educational uses of social networks I first read http://venturebeat.com/2007/12/03/facebook-education-app-gets-funding/ It was an interesting article about the future of how within facebook students could easily form study groups, share notes, and so forth.
Then I went to http://www.infinitethinking.org/2008/01/social-networking-in-education.html which had a host of links (this is where I got sidetracked). One site that was interseting was http://www.classroom20.com/ Two things I found that are somewhat unrelated, but amazing were this Karl Fisch video: http://www.teachertube.com/view_video.php?viewkey=6f2c2eba77f39993d118&page=1&viewtype=&category= and this one that syncs "We Didn't Start the Fire" with visuals: http://www.teachertube.com/view_video.php?viewkey=f061977fb2f7ba36d74d&page=1&viewtype=&category=
BYU is not currently blocking teachertube. Sweet.
Anyways, back to the article, the author works for Ning...an social network for educators. They had lots of interesting links--but for the ones I clicked on you had to be a part of Ning...
I am left with a lot of thoughts in my mind from the Fisch video, thinking about how much web-traffic myspace and facebook currently generate, and yet they did not exist just five years ago. What an interesting task to think about how social networks can affect education.
That happened to me today. While searching for educational uses of social networks I first read http://venturebeat.com/2007/12/03/facebook-education-app-gets-funding/ It was an interesting article about the future of how within facebook students could easily form study groups, share notes, and so forth.
Then I went to http://www.infinitethinking.org/2008/01/social-networking-in-education.html which had a host of links (this is where I got sidetracked). One site that was interseting was http://www.classroom20.com/ Two things I found that are somewhat unrelated, but amazing were this Karl Fisch video: http://www.teachertube.com/view_video.php?viewkey=6f2c2eba77f39993d118&page=1&viewtype=&category= and this one that syncs "We Didn't Start the Fire" with visuals: http://www.teachertube.com/view_video.php?viewkey=f061977fb2f7ba36d74d&page=1&viewtype=&category=
BYU is not currently blocking teachertube. Sweet.
Anyways, back to the article, the author works for Ning...an social network for educators. They had lots of interesting links--but for the ones I clicked on you had to be a part of Ning...
I am left with a lot of thoughts in my mind from the Fisch video, thinking about how much web-traffic myspace and facebook currently generate, and yet they did not exist just five years ago. What an interesting task to think about how social networks can affect education.
I have become a facebook addict
I have been an avid email user since 1996. Back in "those days" you had to pay $3.00 per month to have a BYU email account and the online place I knew how to access the Internet was in the labs at the Talmadge building. Then I went on a mission, and when I came back it was a whole new world.
Email has been my primary communication since then, and I have frankly been annoyed when some people don't promptly return my emails. I noticed this particularly among my institute students in Miami, many of whom always talked about "facebook."
Alas, my computer (owned by the Church Educational System) blocked facebook so I never got to join in the fun.
Fastforward to September 2008. I want to keep in touch with all my loved ones in Miami, co-workers at Deseret Book are insisting I get facebook, and even my mom has an account. I waited until we were supposed to open an account for this class (the original date) and then began my facebook experience with gusto.
Now my life has changed.
Okay, that is a bit dramatic, but facebook has become a significant part of my communications life. I've reconnected with people from my mission (companions and converts), touched base with people I have met at different stages of life, and even become "friends" with some new people.
One of the reasons I was persuaded to try facebook is that I want to see how it can leveraged as a means to communicate uplifting messages. I'm not too interested in updates like, "I hate the testing center. lol." But I do think facebook can be leveraged for good. I have made two "status updates" both of which were along these lines.
First, I made my status a gospel question that I was asked in a religion class I am teaching. It was a question that I did not know the answer to! About seven people responded (either by commenting on my status or writing me a message) and the question was answered, so hopefully some knowledge was gained.
My second post included a link to an article I wrote for Deseret Book's Timeout for Women (http://deseretbook.com/time-out/devotional?dev_id=1602) My hope was that my former institute students, and others, would read the message and benefit from it. About the same number of people (seven) wrote on my wall or sent messages indicating it was helpful to them. I wonder, does that mean that only seven people followed the link? Is there a generalizable rule...if 7 people commented, then 14, or 21, etc. actually read it? I do not know.
I still think it is somewhat inconvenient to check email and facebook (why can't people just send me an email instead of writing on my wall) and email is my preferred mode of communication. But I still check my facebook account from my phone while walking up the hill to campus. And sometimes even during class. (don't tell anyone).
Email has been my primary communication since then, and I have frankly been annoyed when some people don't promptly return my emails. I noticed this particularly among my institute students in Miami, many of whom always talked about "facebook."
Alas, my computer (owned by the Church Educational System) blocked facebook so I never got to join in the fun.
Fastforward to September 2008. I want to keep in touch with all my loved ones in Miami, co-workers at Deseret Book are insisting I get facebook, and even my mom has an account. I waited until we were supposed to open an account for this class (the original date) and then began my facebook experience with gusto.
Now my life has changed.
Okay, that is a bit dramatic, but facebook has become a significant part of my communications life. I've reconnected with people from my mission (companions and converts), touched base with people I have met at different stages of life, and even become "friends" with some new people.
One of the reasons I was persuaded to try facebook is that I want to see how it can leveraged as a means to communicate uplifting messages. I'm not too interested in updates like, "I hate the testing center. lol." But I do think facebook can be leveraged for good. I have made two "status updates" both of which were along these lines.
First, I made my status a gospel question that I was asked in a religion class I am teaching. It was a question that I did not know the answer to! About seven people responded (either by commenting on my status or writing me a message) and the question was answered, so hopefully some knowledge was gained.
My second post included a link to an article I wrote for Deseret Book's Timeout for Women (http://deseretbook.com/time-out/devotional?dev_id=1602) My hope was that my former institute students, and others, would read the message and benefit from it. About the same number of people (seven) wrote on my wall or sent messages indicating it was helpful to them. I wonder, does that mean that only seven people followed the link? Is there a generalizable rule...if 7 people commented, then 14, or 21, etc. actually read it? I do not know.
I still think it is somewhat inconvenient to check email and facebook (why can't people just send me an email instead of writing on my wall) and email is my preferred mode of communication. But I still check my facebook account from my phone while walking up the hill to campus. And sometimes even during class. (don't tell anyone).
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Education Use of Social Objects
Can educational content be a social object? Why or why not?
Absolutely! Social objects, by definition, are objects that gets people “talking.” A video clip for example could be shown, with the instruction to discuss its implications afterwards. That video clip becomes a social object. An interesting challenge for educators is how to make their content “social” while still maintaining the necessary content and rigor.
Can assessments or assignments be social objects? Why or why not?
I believe so. I want to throw out something I’ve done and see if it fits the bill. In the Book of Mormon classes I teach, I have the students bring a written (yes, on paper) summary of insights they have gained from their scripture study that week. I will often have student read each others papers as class begins and give each other (positive) feedback on it. In this respect I’m trying to take an assignment they’ve done and turn it into an object for social conversation.
If you've ever taken a class that used a learning management system (LMS) like Blackboard, how compatible does the idea of social objects appear to be with the notion of a learning management system?
I’m using blackboard for the first time this semester and so far it seems like a less-effective way. There are probably features I haven’t explored yet; but it seems mostly like a good way to transmit information (download assignments, take quizzes, etc.), rather than an effective way of encouraging conversation. Wikis or blogs would probably do a better job of that.
A good post on the educational use of social objects was:
http://nogoodreason.typepad.co.uk/no_good_reason/2008/01/whats-a-social.html
A key takeaway I gained from this article was that content itself is a key “social object,” although it often gets pushes aside in favor of other, flashier, objects.
The second post I found was http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/437 Curiously enough this post was from David Wiley and he quoted from the exact same blog I had just read. Weird. Of course, it has good insights—and—just for fun, let’s carefully examine this phrase:
“The campfire does, of course, have important nonsocial functions (like providing heat) just like educational content has important nonsocial functions (like conveying information), but the most important function of both the campfire and educational content is the manner in which it draws people together.”
What is the most important function of the campfire? As one who hates camping (ouch) I have still sat around a few campfires in my day. When I first read this statement I thought, “Well the most important part of a campfire is the warmth” (leading to, the most important part of educational content is conveying information). I was remembering some cold nights.
But as I thought on more recent camping trips I have been on, the campfire really wasn’t for warmth. If you go too close it was uncomfortably hot and there was smoke (I’m sure there are educational analogies to this as well). What kept me warm were my clothes, and at times, a sleeping bag.
This led me to reason that there are other ways of conveying information as well—time spent in class is not the only way students will gain knowledge.
After thinking more about it, I think an analogy similar to the campfire is the dinner table. Yes, part of the family sitting down together to eat is to build caloric intake; however, the most important reason for sitting down together is the social interaction that takes place.
Absolutely! Social objects, by definition, are objects that gets people “talking.” A video clip for example could be shown, with the instruction to discuss its implications afterwards. That video clip becomes a social object. An interesting challenge for educators is how to make their content “social” while still maintaining the necessary content and rigor.
Can assessments or assignments be social objects? Why or why not?
I believe so. I want to throw out something I’ve done and see if it fits the bill. In the Book of Mormon classes I teach, I have the students bring a written (yes, on paper) summary of insights they have gained from their scripture study that week. I will often have student read each others papers as class begins and give each other (positive) feedback on it. In this respect I’m trying to take an assignment they’ve done and turn it into an object for social conversation.
If you've ever taken a class that used a learning management system (LMS) like Blackboard, how compatible does the idea of social objects appear to be with the notion of a learning management system?
I’m using blackboard for the first time this semester and so far it seems like a less-effective way. There are probably features I haven’t explored yet; but it seems mostly like a good way to transmit information (download assignments, take quizzes, etc.), rather than an effective way of encouraging conversation. Wikis or blogs would probably do a better job of that.
A good post on the educational use of social objects was:
http://nogoodreason.typepad.co.uk/no_good_reason/2008/01/whats-a-social.html
A key takeaway I gained from this article was that content itself is a key “social object,” although it often gets pushes aside in favor of other, flashier, objects.
The second post I found was http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/437 Curiously enough this post was from David Wiley and he quoted from the exact same blog I had just read. Weird. Of course, it has good insights—and—just for fun, let’s carefully examine this phrase:
“The campfire does, of course, have important nonsocial functions (like providing heat) just like educational content has important nonsocial functions (like conveying information), but the most important function of both the campfire and educational content is the manner in which it draws people together.”
What is the most important function of the campfire? As one who hates camping (ouch) I have still sat around a few campfires in my day. When I first read this statement I thought, “Well the most important part of a campfire is the warmth” (leading to, the most important part of educational content is conveying information). I was remembering some cold nights.
But as I thought on more recent camping trips I have been on, the campfire really wasn’t for warmth. If you go too close it was uncomfortably hot and there was smoke (I’m sure there are educational analogies to this as well). What kept me warm were my clothes, and at times, a sleeping bag.
This led me to reason that there are other ways of conveying information as well—time spent in class is not the only way students will gain knowledge.
After thinking more about it, I think an analogy similar to the campfire is the dinner table. Yes, part of the family sitting down together to eat is to build caloric intake; however, the most important reason for sitting down together is the social interaction that takes place.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)